U.S. lawyers said that Google is "once, twice, three times a monopolist," while Google's lawyers claimed the DOJ proved "the exact opposite" of a monopoly. Next, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema will decide whether the case has merits.

Welcome back to Week in Review. This week, we’re exploring the DOJ telling Google to sell off Chrome to break up its monopoly, OpenAI accidentally deleting potential evidence in The New York Times’ copyright lawsuit against it,

US antitrust lawyers are calling on a judge to force the sale of Google's Chrome browser to limit the company's market clout in a move that would shake up the

The spinoff would be a major blow to the tech giant and will likely kick off a legal fight with wide-reaching implications for its core business.

Well, the rumors were true: this week the DOJ argued that Google should sell off Chrome to make up for its monopolistic search practices.

Alphabet Inc.’s Chrome browser could go for as much as $20 billion if a judge agrees to a Justice Department proposal to sell the business, in what would be a historic crackdown on one of the world’s biggest tech companies.